🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.